With elections only a few
weeks away, Britain’s three main political parties have outlined
tough election policies to tighten the noose around immigrants.
The three major parties;
Labour, Conservatives and the
Liberal Democrats are targeting non-European Union
immigrants through plans on “controlled migration”, capping the
limit on the number of immigrants and restricting them to
certain geographical areas.
Labour’s tough
points-based system is already designed to reduce foreign
migration in the UK. It’s recent “earned citizenship” policy
threatens to deny settlement rights to immigrants who would have
spent a considerable period of time as tax payers in the country
and aspiring to settle down in the country.
Conservatives have widely
discussed on applying a cap on immigration by proposing
an annual limit to reduce immigration from non EU countries. The migration inflow under the Points
Based System for 2009 was estimated to be around 150,000. Since
a cap cannot be placed on migrants coming from
European Union
or on asylum seekers due to
human rights
conventions, it is highly likely that if
Conservative party forms government they will target
immigrants entering the country on tier 1, tier 2 and student
visas.
Setting a cap on immigrant
population may be a popular way of garnering more votes but the
contribution of immigrants towards the economy cannot be
ignored. Studies have
shown that although glamorous on paper, practical implementation
can be difficult and can in turn affect skilled labour, which is
crucial for public
sectors like the NHS and other similar sectors with
skills shortage. Moreover, those coming on student visas to
study in the UK universities would not be keen to come to the UK
if they are not given opportunities for post study work. This
can cause serious downfall in the £ 12.5 billion per
year estimated economic contribution of
international students to the UK economy.
Moreover, one of the
proposals of the Conservative party
for immigrants to integrate in the UK includes compulsory
English language tests for those coming to the UK to get
married. This test, which is a pre requisite for settlement
purposes, is an unnecessary requirement at such an early stage
when the applicant has to cope with additional pressures of
settling down in a foreign country.
The Liberal Democrats on
the other hand, suggest regional migration limits whereby visas
would be issued for a particular area of the country, curtailing
the migrant’s ability to move to other crowded parts of the UK.
Such a measure not only curtails the basic right to
freedom of
movement in the country but it is also impractical if the
individual has to relocate to some other part of the country for
various reasons.
Camillus Osubor, Head of
Policy, HSMP Forum said, “Setting geographical restrictions is
not fair on the part of a future government that encourages a
migrant to contribute as a taxpayer but does not allow them the
mobility to improve their prospects.”
Amit Kapadia, Executive
Director, HSMP Forum said, “It is already well known that under
the present UK government, the position of the migrant is quite
unpredictable and uncertain. However, any new party forming the
government could lead to a complete overhaul of the system,
bringing in new policies, committees and decisions. As voters
and more importantly immigrants, the choice is between the devil
and the deep sea and therefore it is imperative to have a clear
idea of a political party’s
immigration policies before people cast their precious
vote.”
References:
Website –
www.hsmpforum.org
/
www.hsmpforumltd.com
The HSMP Forum took
its name from the UK's ‘Highly
Skilled Migrant Programme’
which was introduced in 2002.
HSMP Forum represents
immigrants coming from non
European Union
countries and as well those settled here
and campaigns on various immigration issues, it represents
people of all nationalities and cultures. It is an immigrant
support organisation and campaigns for immigrants cause.
The organisation's aim is to support and assist immigrants under
the world-renowned British principles of fair-play, equality and
justice and believes in challenging any unfair policies which
undermines migrants’ interests.
The limit to limits: Is Cap on immigration a viable policy
for the UK: IPPR
|